|
|
Boston
January 03, 2007
A new report on The Impacts of Commuter Rail in Greater Boston [PDF link] by urban planner Erin Beaton reaches some surprising conclusions about the efficacy of fixed rail train systems. Tom Keane lays it out in the Boston Globe—
One would think, for instance, that new commuter-rail stations might encourage development nearby. It turns out they don’t. Areas around train stations are only modestly more developed than anywhere else. One would also think that new stations might encourage more use of public transit. That is also untrue. The number of people using transit to get to work is largely unchanged by the addition of new stations.
Those results may seem counterintuitive but, upon reflection, make enormous sense. Take a look at the MBTA’s lovely color-coded maps of its rail system. All lines run into Boston. That would be smart planning if Boston were where all of the employers were. However, though that may have been largely true a century ago, today just a quarter of the jobs in the metropolitan region are downtown. Instead, you’ll find them along the beltways – Route 128 and Interstate 495 – and at office parks in between.
Besides, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a typical worker holds a job for just four years. So, when it comes time to buy a house, there is little value in getting something close to a rail station. After all, most jobs can’t be accessed from one (try, for example, taking the T from Medway to the Westborough Technology Park – it can’t be done). And even if your current job happens to be downtown, the odds are that your next job will be elsewhere.
There’s more. Commuter rail is skewed toward serving the affluent. Unlike buses or subways, rail largely connects well-off suburbanites to downtown jobs in high-paid fields such as finance and law. Moreover, new rail stations have a trivial effect on automobile use, meaning they do little to help the environment. (In fact, according to the MBTA’s own data, commuter rail – which relies on diesel-powered trains – often increases the emissions of nitrogen oxides, which can contribute to the formation of smog.) And travel by rail is not as inexpensive as its advocates would have you believe. If you own a car already, the cost of driving may actually be cheaper.
| Permalink
October 27, 2006
An East Coaster identifies The L.A. Times' ongoing identity crisis. David Geffen looks to buy the paper—is this the end of Times?Geffen's not alone in looking to take papers private, as Jack Welch pursues the Boston Globe (will his wife edit the paper?) and Yusef Jackson goes after the Chicago Sun-Times (which would then be a safe bet to back his father and brother, no?), and now local politician Ted Venetoulis is heading a group looking to purchase the Baltimore Sun.Staying in Baltimore, the status quo is striking back—will Mayor O'Malley's new enemies make him a victim of his own success as he runs for governor?Over in D.C., Democratic nominee and presumptive next maor Adrian Fenty continues his magical mystery tour. Having already visited with O'Malley, Daley and Bloomberg, he's now gone to L.A. to talk about local control of schools and other issues with Mayor Villaraigosa.
| Permalink
October 23, 2006
—Congrats to the Tigers for the win last night, but the World Series won't help Detroit very much, and the Super Bowl back in February didn't either.
—More coming this week on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's purchase of the Chicago Board of Trade to create the world's biggest exchange.
—Old fashioned physical proximity still matters in Silicon Valley, while Wall Street looks to Pennsylvania to back up, spread out and spread risk. (More at WallStreetWest.org).
—Speaking of spread-out New York, Brookings finds exurbia ascendant north of the city.
—On the left coast, Witold Rybczynski looks at San Francisco and when bad architecture happens to good cities.
—Back East, The Boston Globe is on track for its first unprofitable year ever, and Julia Vitullo-Martin compares Philadelphia to Boston and finds Philly's culture wanting. (Of course Boston being THE university town, with a built-in high tech sector as such, also helps).
—And Harry Siegel in the New York Post on how Governor Pataki and his fellow incumbocrats hollowed out New York's GOP.
| Permalink
|
|
|